The 2025 Partners for Justice Conference Planning Committee & Panel Coordinators will use this webpage to store important links related to Conference Planning. Please do not share this website with those outside the Conference Planning Committee & Panel Coordinators. Thank you!
SAVE THE DATE
Wednesday, May 21, 2025
Baltimore Convention Center
1 W. Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD 21201
Topics Selected:
Resolving Student Loan Debt Inside and Outside of Bankruptcy
This panel will review the new Department of Education guidelines regarding the discharge of student loans, and will explore other ways to resolve student loan debt inside and outside of bankruptcy.
Proposed Panelists:
- Jeffrey Scholnick, Scholnick Law, Baltimore County
- Kat Hyland, Former Practitioner, Baltimore City
Proposed Moderator: William Steinwedel, Maryland Legal Aid -- Baltimore City
Coordinator: William Steinwedel, Maryland Legal Aid; wsteinwedel@mdlab.org
Why it's important: Because discharging student loan debt in bankruptcy has become easier, and there are now more options to resolve student loan debt than there were before, and this is very relevant to practitioners that practice consumer law.
Themes:
- Innovative Service
Rent Escrow and Habitability After the Tenant Safety Act
The Tenant Safety Act fundamentally changed the way in which rent escrow and warranty of habitability claims are brought. With the ability to collect attorney fees and other aspects of the statutes that changed- the way in which we are brining these cases has changed. While the change is recent, advocates will have several months to build knowledge of these cases to share in a larger group.
Proposed Panelists:
- Emily Read, Maryland Legal Aid -- Anne Arundel County
- Valda Ricks, Pro Bono Resource Center of Maryland -- Baltimore City
- Elizabeth Ashford, Public Justice Center -- Baltimore City
Proposed Moderator: Joe Loveless, Maryland Legal Aid -- Frederick County
Coordinator: James Bell, Maryland Legal Aid; jbell@mdlab.org
Why it's important: With ACE, a large amount of the community is now housing focused. The result is that we are all regularly seeing these cases. Since the statute has changed so much, a refresher of how to handle these cases, and an opportunity to talk about our successes.
Themes:
- Substantive Legal
Advocating for Justice: Strategies and Innovations in Representing Detained Immigrants
This panel will dive into the current landscape of advocacy for detained immigrants, highlighting new approaches, strategies, and programs designed to secure fair treatment, reduce detention time, and promote due process. The panelists will share innovative legal and community-driven advocacy models that aim to support detained immigrants, especially those from marginalized backgrounds, in navigating a complex system.
Proposed Panelists:
- Monica Mananzan, Amica Center for Immigrant Rights -- Maryland
- Maureen Sweeney, Chacon Center for Immigrant Justice -- Maryland
- Stephanie Wolf, Maryland Office of the Public Defender -- Maryland
Proposed Moderator: Cate Scenna, Pro Bono Resource Center of Maryland - Baltimore City
Coordinator: Monica Mananzan, Amica Center for Immigrant Rights; monica@amicacenter.org
Why it's important: This session on "Advocating for Justice: Strategies and Innovations in Representing Detained Immigrants" is highly relevant to the legal services community, especially in today’s challenging climate of increased immigration enforcement and policy shifts impacting detained populations. Detention not only limits access to legal representation but also places immense physical, emotional, and financial strain on immigrants and their families. For legal professionals committed to ensuring due process, understanding the evolving landscape of detention, the innovative legal tools available, and the community support options is critical. The session will provide practical strategies and inspire fresh perspectives on advocating effectively for this vulnerable population. It’s an opportunity to learn from those on the frontlines, exchange ideas on overcoming systemic barriers, and explore how we, as a community, can expand access to justice for those who need it most.
Themes:
- Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Belonging
- Innovative Service
- Pro Bono Engagement
- Substantive Legal
- Technology & Data
Law & (dis)Order: Navigating the intersection of Disability and Dignity in the Courtroom (pending final version)
This panel discussion will offer insight in recognizing, addressing, and accommodating client’s with disabilities in limited and same-day representation that protects and preserves their dignity in the courtroom.
Proposed Panelists:
- Katelyn Keegan, Law Office of Katelyn Keegan -- Maryland
- TBD - Attorney, Justice in Aging -- Washington D.C.
- TBD
Proposed Moderator: Perneita Farrar, P. Farrar Legal Services LLC -- Anne Arundel County
Coordinator: Perneita Farrar, P. Farrar Legal Services LLC; perneita@pfarrarlegal.com
Why it's important: Dignity is a significant concept in law, ethics, and morality, and should be preserved for every client, despite their ability to pay for legal representation. However, for clients with disabilities, maintaining dignity throughout the proceedings is often as important as the outcome.
The legal profession’s influence is felt not only at the macro level of class action suits and legislative proposals, but also at the micro level of individual case counseling. For same-day/limited representation, the process of client-centered counseling can be time consuming, but it’s important for attorneys and judges to take necessary steps to acknowledge any special needs of the client and do their best to make reasonable accommodations that directly impact the clients dignity, such as resisting paternalism or making assumptions based on stereotypes.
The legal process can be intimidating to every client, but for those with disabilities (who often have more at stake), the preservation of dignity can be easily overlooked or downright ignored, in the name of advocacy. Absent any competency issues, clients with disabilities, like any other client, expects to participate actively in an attorney-client relationship. The U.S. Supreme Court often discusses dignity in cases where plaintiffs seek to vindicate or preserve their rights.
Themes:
- Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Belonging
Freelance Isn’t Free: Protecting Freelance Workers in Maryland and Around the U.S.
Did you know nearly 8 in 10 freelancers struggle with nonpayment? Freelancers are over a third of the national workforce and nonpayment affects individuals across all industries – from construction to television. On November 16, 2016, the first Freelance Isn’t Free Act was signed into law in New York City. Subsequently, similar legislation has passed in Seattle, Los Angeles, Minneapolis, Illinois State, and New York State. This panel will consider the laws that have been passed, the protections afforded, and the variations within them. Additionally, the panel will assess opportunities to ensure freelancers in Maryland, a significant segment of Maryland’s workforce, get paid on time every time.
Proposed Panelists:
- Nicholas Cohen, Maryland Citizens for the Arts -- Baltimore City
- Rafael Espinal, Freelancers Union -- New York City
- TBD -a practitioner who is bringing cases under one of these acts -- laws have been enacted in New York City, Seattle, Los Angeles, Minneapolis, Illinois State, and New York State
Proposed Moderator: Christia Ravenell, Maryland Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts - Baltimore City
Coordinator: Sarah Scalet, Maryland Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts; sarah@mdvla.org
Why it's important: Maryland freelancers are a significant segment of Maryland’s workforce, yet accessing payment is an ongoing challenge for these individuals. According to national statistics, 71% of freelancers face nonpayment or late payment, and unpaid freelancers lose an average of $5,968/year. Anecdotally, Maryland Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts (MdVLA) regularly connects income-qualified individual freelancers with pro bono attorneys to address issues of nonpayment. A handful of bills have been made into laws across the country (some enacted just this year) and they share commonalities. We are interested in analyzing these laws, and discussing how something similar could be implemented here in Maryland. We believe that a Freelance Workers Protection Act in Maryland could have a tremendous, positive impact on people who are working hard to earn a living yet struggle to receive payment for their work. It would benefit the individuals and communities we serve as legal service providers.
Themes:
- Substantive Legal
Healing Tools for Justice Workers
In a high-stakes environment where legal professionals are often exposed to trauma and systemic injustices, this workshop aims to provide essential healing tools for justice workers to foster resilience and well-being. Participants will engage in practical, culturally informed self-care strategies that incorporate mindfulness, community support, and creative expression. Through guided meditation, reflective writing exercises, and group discussions, attendees will explore how these healing practices can mitigate burnout and enhance their capacity to serve vulnerable populations effectively. By integrating holistic approaches into their daily routines, justice workers can cultivate a sustainable practice that not only supports their own mental health but also strengthens their commitment to equitable justice for all.
Proposed Panelists:
- Tuesday Barnes, Morgan State University -- Baltimore City
- Imani Jackson, MICA -- Baltimore City
- Arthur Powell, Duke University - Baltimore City
Proposed Moderator: TBD by Committee
Coordinator: Tuesday Barnes, Morgan State University; tubar1@morgan.edu
Why it's important: This session is highly relevant to the legal services community because it addresses the significant challenges that legal professionals face in their demanding roles. Working in an environment where trauma and systemic injustices are prevalent can take a toll on mental health, leading to burnout and diminished capacity to advocate for clients. By offering practical, culturally informed self-care strategies, this workshop empowers justice workers to prioritize their well-being. Participants will learn how to incorporate mindfulness, community support, and creative expression into their daily routines, providing them with essential tools to navigate the emotional landscape of their work. Through guided meditations, reflective writing, and group discussions, attendees will gain insights into the importance of self-care not just for personal resilience but also for enhancing their effectiveness in serving vulnerable populations. This session aligns perfectly with the Conference's mission to improve access to justice, as it fosters a healthier, more sustainable approach to the vital work of legal services professionals. By equipping justice workers with these healing tools, we can ensure that they remain committed and energized in their pursuit of equitable justice for all.
Themes:
- Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Belonging
Stigmatization of BIPOC Survivors of Sexual Violence
Panelist consist of those who have worked with Black, Person of Color Communities that identify as survivors of sexual trauma that often see stigma across the board, but especially for survivors of color. The panelists will outline historically, economically, systematically, and culturally how survivors of color are always left behind in the context of survivorship and how their roles help elevate the voice of the voiceless. Many of the panelists are leaders, advocates, survivors, teachers, counselors or people that have worked alongside this community for 2-10+ years. The topics can range from biases within criminal justice community partners, medical biases, and even victim services.
Proposed Panelists:
- Breanna Allen, All-En Consulting --Toledo, Ohio
- Lauren Spector, Mindfulness Counseling -- Cleveland, Ohio
- Myia Makupson, University of Tennessee
Proposed Moderator: TBD by Committee
Coordinator: Remi Zellers, Morgan State University; rezel1@morgan.edu
Why it's important: I think it helps inform those who are aware how they can be a part of the system of trauma that survivors engage with. I also think it can help benefit people who are uneducated on how trauma shows up for BIPOC communities differently and how to handle survivors with proper care and support, more understanding of trauma informed care and understanding for minorities in these enfranchised communities.
Themes:
- Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Belonging
Practical AI and Automation Tools for Maryland Legal Nonprofits
We'll share a spectrum of reasonably safe and trustworthy generative AI and automation tools and techniques that small organizations with little or no technical support can implement easily or with help from within the community.
First, we'll look at a few of the major commercial off-the-shelf tools for office efficiency, and provide a cookbook approach to developing your own solutions.
Then we'll explore a few bigger AI and automation projects underway in Maryland, and think about how they can directly benefit the community and provide models for further development.
Finally, we'll look at elements that go into an AI Use Policy, and give participants some insights on balancing usefulness and information safety.
Proposed Panelists:
- Dave Pantzer, Maryland Legal Services Corporation -- Baltimore City
- Russ Bloomquist, Maryland Legal Aid -- Baltimore City
- TBD
Proposed Moderator: TBD by Committee
Coordinator: Dave Pantzer, Maryland Legal Services Corporation; dpantzer@mlsc.org
Why it's important: When new generative AI tools hit the news in recent years, many sat back to see if the fad would blow over, or if the world would be remade. The reality so far is somewhere in between, but legal services programs and funders across the county are engaging with these tools, and seeking responsible ways to boost efficiency and help more people.
Any extreme approach to AI, from all-out embrace to all-out refusal, creates risks for an organization; our hope is to showcase responsible ways for organizations in Maryland to approach the opportunities and risks.
Themes:
- Innovative Service
- Management
- Technology & Data
Grassroots Justice: Community Justice Workers Building Access from the Ground Up
Engage in an interactive dialogue and listening session about the Maryland movement to establish community justice workers, what it could mean for access to the legal system for all, and implications for the civil legal services community. Participants will hear from speakers with diverse perspectives and experiences and have an opportunity to provide input on the Maryland effort.
Proposed Panelists:
- Dr. Bernadette Fouche, Wicomico County Department of Health -- Wicomico County
- Syeetah Hampton-EL, Office of Administrative Hearings -- Anne Arundel County
- Hon. Angela Eaves, Supreme Court of Maryland -- Baltimore City
Proposed Moderator: Marshall Shord, Shore Legal Access - Talbot County
Coordinator: Meredith Girard, Shore Legal Access; mgirard@shorelegal.org
Why it's important: The movement towards a Maryland community justice worker initiative is already under way. The concept has the potential to transform the way that people with limited financial means resolve their legal issues, with significant implications for the civil legal services community. This is a key opportunity both for learning and gathering input and feedback for Maryland's effort.
Themes:
- Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Belonging
- Innovative Service
A Dialogue on Increasing Access to Justice for People with Disabilities
Join us for an honest discussion led by panelists, including practicing attorneys with disabilities on navigating the legal profession’s technology and accessibility challenges. The panelists will share best practices on what works and what does not, and what firms, non-profits, and the courts can do to better address these challenges. The panelists will discuss the applicable intersection of assistive technology and inclusion, covering ABA resolutions, ethical norms, emerging law and policy related to disability accessibility in the digital space, including a brief display of available technologies.
Proposed Panelists:
- Gary C. Norman, Lawyer, Consultant, and Columnist -- Montgomery County
- Hon. Ana Hernandez, District Court of Maryland for Baltimore City -- Baltimore, MD
- Richard Shermanski, Legal Ethics Expert -- Montgomery County
Proposed Moderator: Meredith Girard, Shore Legal Access - Talbot County
Coordinator: Richard Shermanski, Legal Ethics Expert; rshermanski86@gmail.com
Why it's important: This session speaks directly to the heart of creating a more inclusive and accessible legal profession. As law firms and courts increasingly rely on digital tools and remote work capabilities, understanding accessibility challenges and solutions isn't just about compliance—it's about empowering all legal professionals to contribute their talents fully. Through firsthand experiences from attorneys with disabilities, attendees will gain practical insights into implementing accessible technology solutions that benefit everyone in the legal workspace. The session's focus on ABA resolutions and emerging policy frameworks makes it particularly timely for law firm leaders, court administrators, and legal professionals who need to understand their obligations and opportunities in creating accessible digital environments. This knowledge is becoming increasingly critical as the legal profession continues its digital transformation, making it essential for maintaining ethical practice standards and ensuring equal access to justice for both legal practitioners and their clients.
Themes:
- Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Belonging
Maryland’s Protective Order Laws: Progress Made, Goals for the Future
Significant strides have been made in protecting survivors of intimate partner violence through legislative changes in Maryland protective order law. Notable changes include taking guns away from abusers, lowering the burden of proof to obtain a protective order, allowing victims of sexual violence to file for protective orders, and recognizing the role electronic communication and cyberstalking play in domestic violence. We will discuss the practical implementation of these laws, and how the most vulnerable survivors, including communities historically underserved by the legal community and those with limited English proficiency, have been affected.
Moreover, we will focus on how to continue Maryland’s positive changes to protect domestic violence survivors. These changes might include such measures as lengthening the time period between the temporary and final hearing, allowing survivors to obtain restitution for property damage, and recognizing the crippling effects of coercive control. We will address the benefit of these types of changes from a point of view of the legal rights of petitioners and of the effect on their mental and social health. Join us as we analyze the dynamic landscape of domestic violence law, evaluating how it currently functions and envisioning a future shaped by more forward-looking policies.
Proposed Panelists:
- Katherine Bradley, Montgomery County Lawyers Project -- Montgomery County
- Tom Manion, Family Justice Center -- Montgomery County
- Laure Ruth, Maryland Network Against Domestic Violence -- Anne Arundel County
Proposed Moderator: Amy Palumbo, DVS Legal Services -- Montgomery County
Coordinator: Katherine Bradley, Montgomery County Lawyers Project; kbradley@dcvlp.org
Why it's important: Domestic violence impacts all stratas of society and is undoubtedly encountered by many of the legal services community and other participants at the Conference. Having an understanding of how Maryland has strengthened its protection of domestic violence survivors and where there is room for improvement will help legal service providers give survivors a more thorough and comprehensive understanding of how current protective order law can work to protect them and where it may let them down.
Themes:
- Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Belonging
- Innovative Service
- Substantive Legal
From Cradle to (In)Carnation: The Plight of Women of Color in the Criminal Justice System
Women of color are overrepresented in the prison population and underrepresented by the justice system. This fact does not exist in a vacuum; systemic and intersectional factors shape the societal reality and limit the agency of these women. Drawing upon the expertise and experience of the panel members, this session delves into the lifelong journey that an individual can have with the adversarial system.
Proposed Panelists:
- Joy Mvundura, Far West Texas Regional Public Defender -- Alpine, TX
- DaNia Henry, Georgetown University -- Washington D.C.
- Cicely A. Jervis, District of Columbia Public Schools -- Washington D.C.
Proposed Moderator: Corliss Wilson, Morgan State University -- Baltimore City
Coordinator: Corliss Wilson, Morgan State University; cowil56@morgan.edu
Why it's important: The legal services community has an obligation, morally and constitutionally, to not only provide representation but to ensure that representation is justice-centered and culturally competent. This presentation does not aim to be the end-all-be-all on this systemic issue but rather hopes to engage conference participants in a conversation that centers on the lived reality of women of color within the criminal justice system.
- Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Belonging
Client Interviewing and Triage for Same Day Representation
The panelists will provide tips and advice on how to quickly interview and triage a client for same day representation to ensure efficient and effective representation and reduce the need for postponements in Failure to Pay Rent cases.
Proposed Panelists:
- TBD, Pro Bono Resource Center of Maryland -- Baltimore City/County
- Volunteer Attorney, Shore Legal Access -- Mid-Shore Counties
- Attorney TBD, Harford County Bar Foundation -- Harford County
Proposed Moderator: Attorney TBD, Community Legal Services of Prince George's County - Prince George's County
Coordinator: Jessica Quincosa, Community Legal Services of Prince George's County; jquincosa@gmail.com
Why it's important: It will help build skills to increase same day representation and increase capacity for services.
- Pro Bono Engagement
- Substantive Legal
Put It on the Map: Using GIS Technology to Answer Questions About Our Communities
Geospatial data can be used to inform policies, practices, evaluation, and communication around a number of issues. This session will explore GIS technology using examples relevant to the legal services community.
The Maryland Access to Justice Commission created a resource and asset map to serve as a one-stop shop for accessing essential legal and justice-related resources, connecting the community to the information they need. Providing location can not only help those who simply need an address, but also decision makers. Understanding where services are within the state is just as important as knowing where there are gaps. This service as a whole allows us to better understand where services actually are concentrated within the state helping folks make informed decisions when trying to focus a new effort.
The Law Librarians Working Group of the Self-Represented Litigation Network created a Story Map to illustrate data collected for a national survey of law libraries providing services to self-represented litigants. The Story Map is a promotion tool, directory, and best practices resource.
Proposed Panelists:
- Reena Shah, MD A2J Commission -- Baltimore City
- Kelsey Newcomb, Mid-Shore Council on Family Violence -- Mid-shore
- Joan Bellistri, Anne Arundel County Public Law Library -- Anne Arundel
Proposed Moderator: Julia Viets, Montgomery County Law Library -- Rockville, MD
Coordinator: Joan Bellistri, Anne Arundel County Public Law Library; joan.bellistri@mdcourts.gov
Why it’s important: Mapping technology can benefit the legal services community by providing a tool that can enhance data presentation allowing informed decisions when trying to focus a new effort and a means of promoting the organization’s services.
Themes:
- Technology & Data
Lost in the System: Advocating for Defendants in Competency Limbo
This panel will explore the critical issue of competency to stand trial statutes and the advocacy gaps for individuals who are declared incompetent and then effectively left in legal limbo. Many of these defendants are sent to facilities such as Springfield Hospital Center, where they await further evaluations, treatments, or legal decisions. However, their cases often stagnate as they receive little to no contact from the attorneys assigned to represent them.
The session will shed light on the lived experiences of these individuals, who can spend prolonged periods in confinement without the regular legal support necessary to advocate for their rights or monitor their treatment progress. Panelists will discuss the ethical, legal, and social responsibilities of the justice system, identify policy gaps, and propose actionable solutions to ensure meaningful representation and timely intervention for those in competency-related detention.
Learning Objectives:
- Gain an understanding of Maryland’s competency to stand trial statutes and how they impact defendants with mental health issues.
- Identify the key challenges and gaps in legal representation for individuals in competency limbo, with a focus on those at facilities like Springfield Hospital Center.
- Discuss innovative strategies and policy reforms to enhance regular communication and oversight by legal advocates for individuals detained due to competency issues.
- Learn about community-based advocacy approaches and support networks that can bridge the gap when legal counsel is unavailable.
Potential panelists include an attorney and advocate for competency rights; a representative from Maryland Office of the Public Defender who is a specialist in mental health law; a social worker from Springfield Hospital Center who is experienced in working with defendants in competency limbo; or a mental health advocate or SOAR Specialist who focuses on supporting individuals with severe mental health issues in navigating the justice system
Proposed Panelists:
- Mi Mi Worth, Social Worker -- Springfield Hospital Center
- Kimberly June, Advocate -- Hanover MD
- Liz Palen, MD Public Defender -- Annapolis MD
Proposed Moderator: TBD by Committee
Coordinator: Kimberly June, Springforward; kimberlyajune@gmail.com
Why it’s important: This session is intended for pro bono attorneys, public defenders, mental health professionals, and legal advocates focused on mental health and justice reform. It will also benefit policymakers interested in addressing procedural delays and improving accountability for legal representation in cases involving mental competency.
Themes:
- Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Belonging
- Pro Bono Engagement
Block by Block: The Personal Stories of Vacancy
In this session, we will explore the personal stories behind a specific block of vacant properties in Baltimore. After doing title research, we consulted community members and historical records to illustrate how personal level stories weave together with stories of the neighborhood and the city. Attendees should expect to leave the session with a different understanding of how policies impact individual families.
Proposed Panelists:
- Steven Kappen, Maryland Volunteer Lawyers Service -- Baltimore City
- Nneka Nnamdi, SOS Fund -- Baltimore City
Proposed Moderator: TBD by Committee
Coordinator: Steven Kappen, Maryland Volunteer Lawyers Service; skappen@mvlslaw.org
Why it’s important: I think it is a different way of humanizing and explaining one of the deepest issues that affects Baltimore and many cities like it. I hope to bring a different perspective to the policy and economic issues that have led to this problem.
Themes:
- Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Belonging
- Substantive Legal
The Impact on Mental Health and the Capacity to Parent in Child Custody Cases
Representing clients who present with behavioral issues or mental illness can be challenging and complicated for clients and the attorneys who represent them. This session will help attorneys identify parenting and co-parenting tasks and behaviors that may be influenced by mental illness, how they are linked to child outcomes, and how to integrate effectively impactful mental health information into matters of custody and child custody evaluations.
Proposed Panelists:
- Dr. Josef Passley, Passley Consulting & Psychological Services, LLC -- Howard County
- Judge, TBD -- Maryland
- Attorney, TBD -- Maryland
Proposed Moderator: TBD by Committee
Coordinator: Nancy Grimm, Maryland Volunteer Lawyers Service; ngrimm@mvlslaw.org
Why it’s important: This session will help attorneys identify parenting and co-parenting tasks and behaviors that may be influenced by mental illness, how they are linked to child outcomes, and how to integrate effectively impactful mental health information into matters of custody and child custody evaluations.
Themes:
- Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Belonging
- Pro Bono Engagement
How Community Collaboration Fosters Sustainable Reentry
This session will focus on the complex process of an individual transitioning from life in prison back into the community including the challenges they face in finding housing, employment, managing relationships, navigating legal hurdles, and addressing mental health needs while attempting to reintegrate into society after incarceration. Emphasis will be placed on the multidisciplinary approach to release planning and reentry to limit barriers.
Proposed Panelists:
- Shannice Anderson, Maryland Office of the Public Defender -- Baltimore City
- Shareese Kess-Lewis, TIME Organization -- Baltimore City
- Rasheed Bennett, Client of MOPD & TIME Organization -- Baltimore City
Proposed Moderator: TBD by Committee
Coordinator: Shannice Anderson, Maryland Office of the Public Defender; shannice.anderson@maryland.gov
Why it’s important: It is important to highlight the role of community programs and their importance as they can be used in case mitigation and how the impact is shown through the lens of the justice impacted individual.
Themes:
- Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Belonging
- Innovative Service
Topics Not Selected:
Mobile Home Eviction Process
Our housing attorneys have become extremely strong when working under section 8 of the Maryland Real Property code; however there has been less of an emphasis placed on Mobile home cases brought under Section 8A. While the rules are familiar, they are different enough that many housing advocates simply lack the training to properly handle a mobile home case. The intention is to familiarize attendees with the basics of Section 8A with a focus on lease renewal issues, park rules, and basics of rent cases brought under title 8A.
Proposed Panelists:
- Jamie Milliman, Maryland Legal Aid -- Lower Eastern Shore Counties
- Terri Cooke, Maryland Legal Aid -- Prince George's County
- Meredith L. Girard, Shore Legal Access -- Mid-Shore Counties
Proposed Moderator: James Bell, Maryland Legal Aid -- Howard County
Coordinator: James Bell, Maryland Legal Aid; jbell@mdlab.org
Why it's important: While Mobile homes are only a small percentage of dwelling units in many counties, the ACE attorneys often simply do not see the volume needed to learn section 8A. This will provide enough tools in their toolkit to handle basic rent cases for mobile homes so there is not a gap in coverage.
Themes:
- Substantive Legal
Holistic Representation in the Context of "Same-day Representation"
ACE has become the manner in which many organizations attract and obtain clients. Having a client for just that brief period of time does not limit the ability to actually discover and find other issues. A simple rent case often is underpinned by a barrier to employment, or a benefits case. Often they are part of a large DV issue. Same Day representation is fundamentally an outreach event in order to find and provide services to as many people as possible. This panel will cover how we identify other issues for clients in the context of same day representation and what can be done within the limits of our organizations to holistically help our client to be in a better situation overall.
Proposed Panelists:
- Joe Loveless, Maryland Legal Aid -- Frederick County
- Meredith L. Girard, Shore Legal Access -- Mid-Shore Counties
- Ashley Woolard, Public Justice Center -- Baltimore City
Proposed Moderator: James Bell, Maryland Legal Aid -- Howard County
Coordinator: James Bell, Maryland Legal Aid; jbell@mdlab.org
Why it's important: ACE has provided for countless outreach opportunities to further cover the communities in which we serve, but the law limits what we can provide representation under that specific grant. Many organizations have sought out other grants to cover further legal needs. As an attorney on the front lines of these cases, it is often hard to remember that our clients are there for a reason, and we can do much more to help them by helping to resolve the root cause of the housing issue.
Themes:
- Innovative Service
- Pro Bono Engagement
- Substantive Legal
Advocating for Rights in the Alternatives to Detention Program: Legal and Social Support Strategies for ATD Participants
Immigrants enrolled in Alternatives to Detention (ATD) programs face significant barriers, from intensive monitoring practices to complex legal hurdles in their pursuit of stability and status. This panel will address the unique advocacy needs of ATD participants, offering practical guidance for legal and social service providers who support them through deescalation requests, accompaniment to ICE and Intensive Supervision Appearance Program (ISAP) check-ins, removal from ATD programs, and representation in both affirmative and defensive immigration applications. Attendees will explore best practices, emerging strategies, and innovative partnerships to enhance the rights, agency, and well-being of ATD-enrolled immigrants.
Proposed Panelists:
- Monica Mananzan, Amica Center for Immigrant Rights -- Baltimore City
- Daniella Preishoff, Tahirih Justice Center -- Baltimore City
- Anne Rosenthal, Sanctuary Streets of Baltimore -- Baltimore City
Proposed Moderator: TBD by Committee
Coordinator: Monica Mananzan, Amica Center for Immigrant Rights; monica@amicacenter.org
Why it's important: This session is incredibly relevant to the legal services community and the conference because it addresses an urgent and evolving aspect of immigrant representation. By focusing on practical strategies—like reducing surveillance, supporting clients during check-ins, and navigating removal from the ATD program—this session will equip providers with tools to protect their clients' rights and enhance their quality of life. This is also a powerful opportunity to bring together legal and social service providers to discuss emerging best practices, build stronger collaborations, and explore ways to advocate more effectively within a challenging system. Attendees will leave better prepared to support ATD clients not only in their legal cases but also in a way that respects their dignity and autonomy, making this a truly essential session for the conference.
Themes:
- Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Belonging
- Innovative Service
- Pro Bono Engagement
- Substantive Legal
Difficult Clients Need Representation Too! A Discussion on How to Navigate these Situations
Private attorneys have the luxury of screening clients for their responsiveness, expectations, and ability to assist with their cases. However, Legal Service providers are often faced with serving those clients who can be difficult to communicate with, who struggle with their ability to effectively assist with their case, and who may have unrealistic expectations for the services that we can provide. To help navigate these issues, please join us for a panel of experts who can give practical tips for communication, advice on how to protect yourself and your organization from complaints, and a discussion on what Access to Justice means for Legal Service organizations across our state.
Proposed Panelists:
- TBD, Pro Bono Counseling Center -- Maryland
- TBD , Attorney Grievance Commission -- Maryland
- TBD, Member of Access to Justice Commission - Maryland
Proposed Moderator: Melissa Chiasera, Pro Bono Resource Center of Maryland - Baltimore City
Coordinator: Melissa Chiasera, Pro Bono Resource Center of Maryland; mchiasera@probonomd.org
Why it's important: The hope with this panel would be to have speakers from three different sectors give some tips and guidance on how to handle these situations:
- A mental health counselor. Perhaps someone from the Pro Bono Counseling Center? This professional could give some tips on how to best obtain information from folks with mental illnesses or strategies and resources for working with this group.
- A representative from the Attorney Grievance Commission. Many of us worry about complaints against us when we have unhappy clients. Perhaps someone from the AGC could give us an idea of how often this happens for legal services orgs, and tips to make sure we are doing things the right way.
- A representative from the A2J Commission. There is this big push for Access to Justice -- what does that mean to them? Currently, there is Access to Counsel in Evictions -- does that mean we MUST take everyone? Are we basically civil public defenders, or can we choose to not defend a client who seeks our services?
Themes:
- Substantive Legal
Justice for Children with Disabilities: The Critical Role of Family Advocacy
Our panel will offer three perspectives on the importance of family advocacy for children with disabilities. Louise Senft, J.D. and Director of the Baltimore Mediation Center will discuss how she coped with her son's spinal cord injury and resulting paralysis through her podcast, "Blink of an Eye," and the nonprofit she formed to reach out to families in the initial traumatic days following a spinal cord injury. Gary Norman, is blind and is an attorney/mediator who will address, through his personal and professional experience, the impact of family advocacy on achieving educational equality. Megan Miskowski, the Director of an education public policy advocacy group will focus on empowering families facing the additional obstacles of poverty and systemic, structural racism.
Proposed Panelists:
- Louise Phipps Senft, Baltimore Mediation / Blink of and Eye -- Baltimore City
- Gary C. Norman, CMS -- Montgomery County
- Megan Miskowski, Maryland Speech, Language, Hearing Association -- Maryland
Proposed Moderator: Linda Koban, Baltimore City Juvenile Court -- Baltimore City
Coordinator: Linda Koban, Baltimore City Juvenile Court; lindakoban@gmail.com
Why it's important: Families facing the disability of a child from birth, or through disease or accidental injury typically experience a period of grief and helplessness. These reactions can be amplified if parents are economically disadvantaged or culturally marginalized. The best outcomes for these children derive from parents who are equipped to access an array of techniques to meet a child's needs in a person-centered , trauma informed fashion to achieve their kids' best lives going forward. This workshop will present strategies for families from across the economic spectrum to obtain the services their children require and are entitled to by law without resort to litigation.
Themes:
- Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Belonging
- Fundraising
- Innovative Service
- Substantive Legal
The Rise of Credit Reporting: Implications for Justice and Equity
As the landscape of credit reporting evolves, it significantly impacts individuals' access to justice, economic opportunities, and social equity. This session will explore the increasing reliance on credit reports in various sectors, including housing and employment, and discuss the implications for marginalized communities. We will engage participants in a critical dialogue on how credit reporting can both hinder and facilitate access to justice, and identify actionable strategies to address the disparities it creates. There will also be a discussion on how the Fair Credit Reporting Act can be used to resolve credit issues for clients.
Proposed Panelists:
- Vaughn Stewart, Santoni, Vocci & Ortega, LLC -- Baltimore City
- Zafar Shah, Maryland Legal Aid -- Baltimore City
Proposed Moderator: TBD by Committee
Coordinator: Chelsea Ortega, Santoni, Vocci & Ortega, LLC;
Why it's important: Participants will leave with a deeper understanding of the complexities surrounding credit reporting and its implications for justice. They will gain practical tools and strategies to advocate for equitable practices and influence policy changes.
Themes:
- Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Belonging
- Substantive Legal
- Technology & Data
A Safe Place for Whistleblowers
People often ask where are the good police when the bad police are violating citizens rights, but I realize no one wants to do the work to find out. There are allies within law enforcement but we tend to minimalize there safety and discount the sacrifices they make to "do the right thing" a mist the wrong doers. If legal action is taken many lawyers may not want to take their case because the way the system is set up. its a lengthy process and the rewards are some times not as lucrative compared to others who lodge a compliant against a law enforcement officer and the police department. There are so many officers working within their department to undue the lasting negative wedges placed between officers and the community and intentionally work from within to create better environments to foster better relationships with the community and with other officers. So much tax payer funds go towards paying for the misconduct of the officers and they are allowed to continue without fear of the consequences because it is not their money being paid out in lawsuits.
Proposed Panelists:
- Tiffany Simmons, Lawyer -- Washington D.C.
- D'artagnan Spencer, Retired Law Enforcement -- Baltimore City
- Tinea White, Community Member -- Baltimore City
Proposed Moderator: Dr. Pratt Harris, Build & Broaden
Coordinator: Kimberly W. Glanville, Morgan State University; kigla2@morgan.edu
Why it's important: This is a real issue. I am a living testimony. I am currently in the middle of a legal battle with the Baltimore City Police Department and I am witnessing the way the system has been used to work in certain people's favor while others are threatened, intimidated and even have false charges levied against them as a means to have the terminated as a result of them speaking up about injustices within the police department. The majority of them are black women.
- Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Belonging
- Substantive Legal
Critically Examining the "Good Immigrant, Bad Immigrant" Narrative
Both the current legal frameworks and political rhetoric around immigration implicitly or explicitly divides people into the categories of "good" immigrants--who are frequently cast as victims and considered deserving of legal status and social benefits--and "bad" immigrants--who are typically defined by their criminal convictions and considered undeserving of the same protections. This panel seeks to critically examine that stark binary, and suggest ways that legal and social services providers can approach immigration issues in a more nuanced way.
Proposed Panelists:
- Joy Mvundura, Far West Texas Regional Public Defender -- Alpine, TX
- DaNia Henry, Georgetown University -- Washington D.C.
- Cicely A. Jervis, District of Columbia Public Schools -- Washington D.C.
Proposed Moderator: Ellyn Jameson, Amica Center for Immigrant Rights -- Washington D.C.
Coordinator: Ellyn Jameson, Amica Center for Immigrant Rights; ellyn@amicacenter.org
Why it's important: By having a more nuanced view of immigrants and immigration issues, service providers can provide more empathetic and holistic services, and avoid perpetuating harmful narratives. in their work.
- Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Belonging
- Pro Bono Engagement
- Substantive Legal
Access to Council in Eviction Coordinated Intake System
The Access to Counsel in Evictions (ACE) Coordinated Intake System was developed and is run as a partnership between Maryland Legal Services Corporation, United Way of Central Maryland, and Civil Justice, Inc.. No one organization can tackle challenges like these alone. Working together, we have more impact and can help more people. This program, like all of United Way Central Maryland work, is focused on driving equity, access and opportunity. The ACE Coordinated Intake System efficiently connects eligible Maryland tenants at risk of eviction to the ACE-funded legal services providers best-suited to provide them the help they need.
Proposed Panelists:
- Tanya Brown, 211 at United Way of Central Maryland -- Baltimore City
- Jenna Greever, Maryland Center of Legal Assistance -- Maryland
- Sarah Coffey Bowes, Civil Justice -- Maryland
Proposed Moderator: TBD by Committee
Coordinator: Tanya Brown, United Way of Central Maryland; tanya.brown@uwcm.org
Why it's important: This panel will be to provide a broader education to how this program and partnership works. How the process works, and how it offers not only legal services to clients but also, links them to the resources they need with 211 at United Way of Central Maryland.
- Innovative Service
Legal Clinics: Critical for Communities, and Critical for Attorney Development
In this session, learn from volunteers and coordinators about the importance of legal clinics in the community. Panelists include volunteer attorneys who can speak to the impact on their practice, as well as attorney coordinators who can speak to community impact and strategic goals.
Proposed Panelists:
- Angus Derbyshire, Maryland Legal Aid -- Baltimore City
- Perneita Farrar, P. Farrar Legal Services LLC -- Anne Arundel County
- Sarah Scalet, Maryland Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts -- Baltimore City
Proposed Moderator: Aja' Mallory, Maryland Volunteer Lawyers Service -- Baltimore City
Coordinator: Steven Kappen, Maryland Volunteer Lawyers Service; skappen@mvlslaw.org
Why it’s important: Overall, it is a great publicizing opportunity for the types of clinics that several of our partner organizations host.
Themes:
- Pro Bono Engagement
Avoiding Voluntelling: Engaging Volunteers in Legal Services Organizations
What does ideal volunteer engagement look like for you and your organization? What are the main barriers to volunteer engagement? What has worked? How can small organizations use volunteers most effectively? Active engagement from volunteers can help organizations reach their goals and stay engaged in their communities. Come hear from representatives from organizations in varying sizes to hear about real life experiences of working with volunteers in legal services.
Proposed Panelists:
- Etta Moen, Maryland Volunteer Lawyers Service -- Baltimore City
- Lauren Pruitt, FreeState Justice -- Baltimore City
- Alison Vogrin, Baltimore County Department for the Aging -- Baltimore County
Proposed Moderator: TBD by Committee
Coordinator: Etta Moen, Maryland Volunteer Lawyers Service; emoen@mvlslaw.org
Why it’s important: This topic is relevant because so many legal services work with volunteers in varying capacities. Along with this, many organizations share a similar mission of supporting communities in need and creating more access to help in navigating the justice system. Understanding how to best engage volunteers within this mission is only beneficial. Organizations can make better use of their volunteers, volunteers gain a more engaged experience and become more involved in the legal services community, clients benefit from a more effective experience from organizations, and communities benefit from more access to help navigating the legal system. Volunteers are integral to the nonprofit world and knowing how to navigate working with them and understand if other organizations have similar issues can lead to more creative problem solving for the legal services community.
Themes:
- Pro Bono Engagement
Predatory Mortgage Practices Affecting Low Income Homeowners
Predatory mortgage practices affecting low income homeowners and what attorneys can do about them in practice and at the legislative level. Some of the abusive practices would be debt collectors foreclosing on “zombie” second mortgages, servicing errors in loan modification situations, misapplication of payments by servicers, etc.
Proposed Panelists:
- TBD
- TBD
- TBD
Proposed Moderator: TBD
Coordinator: Madonna Lebling, Pro Bono Resource Center of Maryland; mlebling@probonomd.org
Why it’s important: Predatory loans have been a perpetual problem for homeowners. Zombie mortgages have become especially prevalent in the last few years. Mortgages written off after the 2008 mortgage crisis are coming back to life. Legal service organizations can help these homeowners who have no where else to turn.
Themes:
- Substantive Legal
A Deed Primer for the Legal Services Attorney
We could talk about the nuts and bolts of deeds, how/where to find them in Land Records, leasehold deeds and touch upon the ground rent payment system and where to look that up, life estate deeds as a way around probate/big water bills/ creditors, why we don’t do crazy stuff in deeds (to avoid creating clouds on title or big fights among ill-suited deed mates), why the type of tenancy is so important for a variety of issues, bring in a litigator to talk about quiet title and partition and sale issues.
Proposed Panelists:
- TBD
- TBD
- TBD
Proposed Moderator: TBD
Coordinator: Madonna Lebling, Pro Bono Resource Center of Maryland; mlebling@probonomd.org
Why it’s important: Legal service orgs often get requests to add children to deeds, or untangle titles for heirs properties. This primer would inform legal service providers of best practices when confronting these requests.
Themes:
- Substantive Legal
Ensuring We Get Cases Right: Identifying Mistakes That Lead to Child Abuse Being Ruled Out
Proving child sexual abuse is difficult. Because there is seldom physical evidence to support a claim of abuse, a child’s disclosures are the most compelling evidence. However, often the child’s statements are discounted for reasons not supported by the latest science, such as the child was inconsistent in his or her disclosures, or the child seemed coached to make false allegations. Also, the child may have given dates/time frame that made abuse by the accused impossible (e.g., accused had an air-tight alibi). These are some examples of why a Child Protective Services investigator may discount or rule out abuse. Doing so often has a cascading effect in that law enforcement may not criminally charge an alleged abuser and judges in custody cases may fail to protect the child based on CPS’s rule out. Therefore, it is important that we have an understanding of the science concerning abuse, disclosures, children’s use of language, and multiple issues related to properly conducting forensic interviews.
The panel will discuss such science and will include real-world examples of instances where child abuse was ruled out or disregarded despite the presence of studies indicating that the reasons for doing so were not inconsistent with abuse.
Proposed Panelists:
- Dr. Kelly Champion, Psychologist in private practice -- Montgomery County
- Dr. Stephanie Wolf, Maven Psychology Group -- Montgomery County
- Paul Griffin, Child Justice, Inc. -- Montgomery County
Proposed Moderator: Anne Hoyer, Maryland Secretary of State's Office -- Anne Arundel County
Coordinator: Paul Griffin, Child Justice, Inc. -- paul.griffin@child-justice.org
Why it’s important: Attorneys who deal with child abuse cases need to be armed with the latest science supporting the field in order to contradict an erroneous "rule out" by Child Protective Services.
Themes:
- Pro Bono Engagement
- Substantive Legal
Building a Language Justice Ecosystem: Collaboration and Innovation
Ensuring equitable access to the justice system is filled with challenges. For vulnerable populations, such as individuals with limited English proficiency (LEP), this often translates to an inequitable approach in high-stakes scenarios. These situations can lead to severe consequences, including “the loss of their children, homes, and fundamental rights when they face language barriers that deny meaningful access to our judicial system,” as highlighted by Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke of the Civil Rights Division. Facilitating equity in these high-stakes scenarios is, at best, a complex challenge. Addressing complex cultural and linguistic needs isn't a one-size-fits-all task, making it challenging for organizations to develop effective language access solutions. To move beyond basic compliance, we need a collaborative and innovative ecosystem. This approach shifts from a checklist mentality to one that is tailored to local communities, languages, individuals, organizations, and services. Achieving true language justice requires robust cross-sector collaboration, and this panel will explore effective interagency collaboration and resources that enhance language access and advance language justice for LEP individuals. We will discuss diverse strategies, stakeholders, and resources necessary for these efforts, aiming to create a robust language justice framework that better serves the needs of LEP individuals in legal settings.
Proposed Panelists:
- Language Access Specialist, TBD
- Immigration Specialist, TBD
- DEI Expert, TBD
Proposed Moderator: Claudia Burdisso, Avantpage Translations -- Davis, CA
Coordinator: Roxanne Addison, Avantpage Translations; roxanne@avantpage.com
Why it’s important: This session is crucial for the legal services community and the conference as it highlights the importance of developing a collaborative and innovative ecosystem for language justice, aligning with PBRC's mission to support vulnerable populations. It will provide attendees with the tools to enhance language access and foster cross-sector collaboration, ultimately contributing to equitable access to justice for all.
Themes:
- Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Belonging
- Innovative Service
- Management
Leading Well, Working Whole
In this session, we will focus on preventing burnout with wellness systems. The topic of defeating burnout is relevant to the legal services community and the conference because professionals can take on secondary trauma in the course of their work, and not have any idea about where to put it down or how to build systems of self-care and community care.
Proposed Panelists:
- Dr. Carleen Carey, Akoma Leadership Consulting -- Baltimore City
Proposed Moderator: TBD by Committee
Coordinator: Dr. Carleen Carey, Akoma Leadership Consulting; Carleen.Carey@gmail.com
Why it’s important: The topic of defeating burnout is relevant to the legal services community and the conference because professionals can take on secondary trauma in the course of their work, and not have any idea about where to put it down or how to build systems of self-care and community care.
Themes:
- Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Belonging
- Management
Climbing the Peak of Workplace Performance
When it comes to performance in the workplace, employees and employers want the same thing... to hit peak performance. When there is a mismatch of expectations or communication isn't optimal, or an inclusive environment is not present, problems can take over. This session will train managers how to inclusively set expectations, communicate them appropriately, measure performance, identify training and support needs, and provide tools for regular feedback. Attendees will also do mock performance evaluations that require constructive feedback to address performance concerns. Finally, attendees will prepare a sample Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) and learn how to implement a PIP to improve performance.
Proposed Panelists:
- Jennifer van Dulmen, van Dulmen Consulting -- Anne Arundel County
- Jeanne Charles, Community Legal Aid Services -- Akron, OH
- TBD
Proposed Moderator: TBD -- Baltimore Area
Coordinator: Jennifer van Dulmen, van Dulmen Consulting; vandulmenjennifer@gmail.com
Why it’s important: People who are good at their jobs are frequently promoted to management. However, being a good lawyer or good employee does not equate to being a good manager. Management is a skill and managers need to be trained to manage. Legal services programs are no exception and may in fact need the training more than many other workplaces because of increasing demands to meet client needs in an impactful way, respond to funder needs, and make the most of limited resources.
Themes:
- Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Belonging
- Management
Workplans: The Blueprints to Building Stronger Programs
Whether drafting an individual workplan or the advocacy agenda for a legal services organization, you need a place to start, a process, input of others, data, and SMART goals. This session starts from the beginning and walks participants through the process of drafting a workplan. Participants should come prepared with a person, project, or program in mind. Participants will first learn the basics and spend a significant amount of time in workshop mode to draft a workplan. They will provide feedback to others and receive feedback on their own workplan.
Proposed Panelists:
- Jennifer van Dulmen, van Dulmen Consulting -- Anne Arundel County
- Jeanne Charles, Community Legal Aid Services -- Akron, OH
- TBD
Proposed Moderator: TBD -- Baltimore Area
Coordinator: Jennifer van Dulmen, van Dulmen Consulting; vandulmenjennifer@gmail.com
Why it’s important: Legal Services programs say they do workplans, but are they useful? Workplans are a waste of time if they are written and never implemented. A good workplan requires thought, action, and follow-through. If done right workplans can improve individual performance, increase project success, and more strategically target and support impactful advocacy outcomes.
Themes:
- Management
Questions? Contact Kiah Pierre at kpierre@probonomd.org.